File Name: difference between arbitration conciliation negotiation and mediation .zip
Arbitration and mediation are two very different processes that allow parties to resolve disputes outside of court.
Although mediation and arbitration have the same goal in mind, a fair resolution of the issues at hand, there are some major differences which both parties must understand beforehand. The main difference between arbitration and mediation is that in arbitration the arbitrator hears evidence and makes a decision. Arbitration is like the court process as parties still provide testimony and give evidence similar to a trial but it is usually less formal. In mediation, the process is a negotiation with the assistance of a neutral third party.
Although mediation and arbitration have the same goal in mind, a fair resolution of the issues at hand, there are some major differences which both parties must understand beforehand. The main difference between arbitration and mediation is that in arbitration the arbitrator hears evidence and makes a decision. Arbitration is like the court process as parties still provide testimony and give evidence similar to a trial but it is usually less formal.
In mediation, the process is a negotiation with the assistance of a neutral third party. The parties do not reach a resolution unless all sides agree. Mediators do not issue orders, find fault, or make determinations. Instead, mediators help parties to reach a settlement by assisting with communications, obtaining relevant information, and developing options.
Although mediation procedures may vary, the parties usually first meet together with the mediator informally to explain their views of the dispute.
Often the mediator will then meet with each party separately. The mediator discusses the dispute with them, and explores with each party possible ways to resolve it. It is common for the mediator to go back and forth between sides a number of times.
The main focus remains on the parties as they work towards a mutually beneficial solution. Most disputes are successfully resolved and often the parties will then enter into a written settlement agreement. Many people report a higher degree of satisfaction with mediation than with arbitration or other court processes because they can control the result and be part of the resolution.
Arbitration, on the other hand, is generally a more formal process than mediation. An arbitrator could be a retired judge, a senior lawyer or a professional such as an accountant or engineer.
During arbitration, both parties are given an opportunity to present their cases to the arbitrator. Much like a regular court proceeding, lawyers can also question witnesses from both sides. During arbitration, there are usually little if any out-of-court negotiations between parties. The arbitrator has the power to render a legally binding decision which both parties must honour and the award is enforceable in our courts and the courts of countries. Designed by. Difference between Arbitration and Mediation Sat.
Difference between Arbitration and Mediation. All Rights Reserved.
Alternative dispute resolution is a settlement of dispute between the parties, it provides a confidential and alternative method of tackling the problems which avoids going to courts. There are various methods of alternative dispute resolution like: Arbitration, Conciliation, Mediation, Negotiation. Arbitration: It is a process in which disputes resolve between the parties by appointing a independent third party who is impartial and neutral person called arbitrator. Arbitrator hear both the parties before arriving at a solution to their dispute. Conciliation: It is a process in which disputes resolve between the parties by appointing a conciliator who help amicable the disputed parties to arrive at a negotiated settlement.
Litigation refers to the proceedings initiated by one or more parties against one or more parties before a court of law for the enforcement of any legal right or obtaining compensation for some wrong. In criminal cases, generally, the government is the prosecuting party seeking to get the criminal punished in accordance with the prescribed law. Litigation is not only expensive and time-consuming but also emotionally draining and unpredictable. In countries like India where legal battles stretch over several years taking up a lot of time, energy and money of the parties involved, alternative dispute resolution ADR has slowly emerged as a preferred mode of resolving legal disputes in comparison to litigation. There are mainly three recognized modes of ADR namely- arbitration, conciliation, and mediation.
Negotiation, Mediation, and Arbitration · Negotiation Negotiation is a process where two parties in a conflict or disagreement try to reach a resolution together.
How effective are they? Arbitration, mediation and conciliation are the main Alternative Dispute Resolution Mechanism which is generally adopted by the people to resolve their disputes in an informal manner. They try to reach a solution by settlement or negotiation with the assistance of a third neutral party and have turned out to be an effective alternative to the litigation process. When the method of resolution of the dispute chosen by the parties is other than the arbitration, in the form of mediation, negotiation, conciliation, Lok Adalat, online arbitration, then it is Alternative Dispute Resolution herein referred to as ADR.
Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *